Institutional review boards: is this the least worst we can do? Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 101, 749–774 (2007). Google Scholar Zywicki, T. J. Institutional review boards as academic bureaucracies: an economic and experiential analysis. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 101, 861–896 (2007). ...
Ethics boards are common in many other domains. Most research institutions have Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), also known as Ethics Review Committees (ERCs) or Research Ethics Committees (RECs), which review the methods of proposed research on human subjects to protect them from physical or p...
This approach is affirmed by Robert L. Zimdahl and Thomas O. Holtzer, who argue that “the truest test of the moral condition of any scientific or other discipline, indeed of one’s life, is a willingness to examine its moral condition,” asserting that “professors in U.S. colleges of ...
engagement, student experience, faculty collaboration and institutional digital transformation. Tony also has a strong interest in the overlap between education and the evolving world of work, and develops predictions, visions and scenarios to help education institutions understand trends and ...
create something, that you can’t put the genie back in the bottle. You know, the humanities and the social sciences have the Institutional Review Board. I mean, I don’t see why AI shouldn’t have a similar thing where people kind of think about what they’re doing before they make ...
Data science is similar; ethical standards are mostly determined by company culture and individual managers and vary widely among organizations. In some academic fields, review boards may exist to regulate ethical issues either in a proactive (human subjects committee) or reactive (miscond...
A number of regulatory boards and committees, such as the US Financial Stability Oversight Council, the European Systemic Risk Board and the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee, have been created in order to identify, monitor and take actions that can remove or reduce the systemic risk...
The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript. Submitted manuscripts will generally be assigned to a Handling Editor. If determined to be suitable for...
The AI governance system can also include structural arrangements such as ethical review boards [35]. When AI governance is understood as a system, synergies between different tools, such as bias testing methods and participatory design, can be identified. Second, the key elements of an AI ...
ethical concepts from the other fields that should be implemented when applying new AI technologies in HR analytics. She identified five key ethical principles: privacy and confidentiality, opportunity to opt out, institutional review, transparency, and respect for the dynamic nature of personal ...