Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for demographic and lifestyle covariates associated with prediabetes.Suhad, M. Bahijri
However, matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) are preferred over unadjusted ITC methods in the presence of significant heterogeneity between the trials. We performed an anchored MAIC to estimate the relative efficacy of quizartinib vs midostaurin for patients with ND FLT3-ITD+ AML. Methods ...
Conclusions PCC4 was associated with a higher achievement of goal INR than PCC3. This relationship was observed in the unadjusted and propensity score adjusted results.doi:10.1186/s12873-020-00386-zDavid J. MargrafScott SeaburgGregory J. BeilmanJulian WolfsonScott A. ChapmanBMC Emergency Medicine...
QuintileEvents (#)UnadjustedAdjusted Events (%)Proportion, % (95% CI)Risk DifferenceOR (95% CI)p-Value 1st [0 to 20th] 497 0.13 0.142 (0.129, 0.157) −0.04 (−0.06, −0.02) 0.74 (0.68, 0.80) <.0001 2nd [21st to 40th] 565 0.15 0.167 (0.153, 0.184) −0.02 (−0.04, 0.0...
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for anemia by cutoffs of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D.Jana B. ErnstTobias BeckerJoachim KuhnJan F. GummertArmin Zittermann
Weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between WWI and KS in unadjusted, partially adjusted, and all-adjusted models. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis assessed the association between continuous WWI and KS risk and obtained...
This relationship was observed in the unadjusted, propensity score adjusted, and time stratified results.doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000619860.10392.34Margraf, DavidChapman, ScottSeaburg, ScottWolfson, JulianGipson, JonathanBeilman, GregoryCritical Care Medicine...
Clinical OutcomesUnadjustedAdjusted IABP n = 709Impella n = 1,447Odds Ratio (95% CI)p ValueOdds Ratio (95% CI)p Value Survival 91.0% 95.3% 2.01 (1.41, 2.87) 0.0002 1.55 (1.02, 2.36) 0.042 Myocardial infarction 11.9% 2.5% 0.19 (0.13, 0.28) <0.0001 0.29 (0.18, 0.46) <0.0001 STEMI ...
Whether the slightly better results in AIEOP are the result of the differences in age distribution (16.1% of the patients were ≥ 10 years in AIEOP vs 32.3% in BFM) or to treatment differences is not fully known. The SR and MR risk stratification in ALL-BFM 90 was based mainly on the...