an ad hominem argument is still a logical fallacy. Using one of our examples, Steve may very well believe Earth is flat—that doesn’t mean thatnothinghe believes is true or that his belief in a flat Earth negates his other positions. ...
什么是人身攻击谬误(ad hominem fallacy)? 在《学会提问》这本书里,它的解释是“指针对个人的人身攻击或侮辱,而不是直接反驳其提供的理由。”也就是所谓的“对人不对事”。 这个谬误相对来说,还是比较好理解的。它经常发生的场景在于,我们不去指责某个人的观点或者立场,而是指责与其谈话内容无关的这个人的某个...
Using an ad hominem fallacy pulls the public's attention off the real issue and serves only as a distraction. In some contexts it's unethical. It's also calledargumentum ad hominem, abusive ad hominem, poisoning the well, ad personam, andmudslinging. The attacks serve as red herrings to ...
ad hominem (redirected fromAd hominem fallacy) Thesaurus Legal ad hom·i·nem (hŏm′ə-nĕm′, -nəm) adj. 1.Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument:The candidates agreed to focus on the issues rather than making ad hominem attacks against ea...
Ad Hominem Fallacy | Definition, Facts & Examples from Chapter 2/ Lesson 2 55K Learn about the ad hominem fallacy in argumentation with meaning and examples. Discover how the fallacy, although proven to be one, is still commonly used. ...
Ad hominem is a popular type of logical fallacy. Become a better writer and debater by learning more about ad hominem and uncover examples of this argument.
Ad Hominem Definition of Ad Hominem Ad hominem, which stands for the Latin term argumentum ad hominem, is a response to a person’s argument by attacking the person’s character rather than the logic or content of the argument. Ad hominem remarks are often an example of fallacy, because ...
Nikolopoulou, K. (2023, November 13).What Is Ad Populum Fallacy? | Definition & Examples.Scribbr. Retrieved May 5, 2025, from https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/ad-populum-fallacy/ Cite this article Sources McCraw, B. W. (2018). Appeal to the People.Bad Arguments, 112–114. https://...
诉诸人身的谬误(the ad hominem fallacy)是推理错误中最常见的一种,指借由与当前论题无关之个人特质,如人格、动机、态度、地位、阶级或处境等,作为驳斥对方或支持己方论证的理据。如果一个人在驳斥某人观点和结论时,忽略论证本身,而故意去攻击提出该观点的人或此人代表的团体,那么就犯了这个谬误。常见的诉诸人身...
Abusive ad hominem (AAH) is an informal fallacy held to be "sometimes valid." I provide an analysis of AAH and apply it to the question, "Are Freudian and Skinnerian psychological criticisms of religious experience arguments cases of fallacious ad hominem?".;AAH is explicated in terms of ...