综上,Ad Hominem(人身攻击)的表现就是:attacknot theargumentbut the opponent。 但逻辑合理的争论应当是attack the argument。 所以大家在写作时,辩论观点记得重心要放在讨论the argument上。 38 学术写作 logicalfallacies - 15 Ad Hominem(人身攻击)mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=Mzk0MDE3MzA2Ng==&mid=22474...
(redirected from Ad hominem tu quoque)Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal. Related to Ad hominem tu quoque: Argumentum ad hominemad hom·i·nem (hŏm′ə-nĕm′, -nəm) adj. 1. Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument: The candidates agreed to...
综上，Ad Hominem（人身攻击）的表现就是：attacknot theargumentbut the opponent。但逻辑合理的争论应当...
if Person A tells Person B not to eat so much junk food to improve his health, and Person B points out that Person A also eats a lot of junk food, this isad hominem tu quoque. Person A is not wrong to advise Person B not to eat junk...
This type of ad hominem means that the arguer rebuts their opponent by claiming their opponent’s opinion is inconsistent with what they’ve said or what they’ve done. It’s also known as “tu quoque,” which means “you also” in Latin. This type of argument attempts to invalidate the...
ad hominem 美[ˌæd ˈhɑmɪnem] 英[ˌæd ˈhɒmɪnem] na.怀有偏见地;感情用事地;矛头指向个人地 网络人身诘责 英汉 英英 网络释义 na. 1. 怀有偏见地;感情用事地 2. 矛头指向个人地 例句
Definitions : Like the appeal to authority and ad populum fallacies, the ad hominem ( "against the person" ) and tu quoque ( "you, too! " ) 定义:诉诸权威或者群众是论证中的谬误,指向个人(adhominem也就是英文againsttheperson)以及“你也如此”(tuquoque也就是英文you,too!) article.yeeyan.org隐...
ad hominem is a Latin expression that literally means “to the man” or “to the person.” As a literary device, it refers to the act of commenting on or against an individual, usually an opponent, to undermine him/her instead of his/her arguments. Find
person is homeless and therefore not a credible source. Another type of ad hominem attack is the “tu quoque” fallacy, which involves pointing out that the person making the argument is guilty of the same thing they are arguing against. For ...
然而,“天下乌鸦一般黑”的论证不仅仅是声称对方和自己一样有罪。正如Douglas Walton(1998)所强调的那样:“教科书对‘天下乌鸦一般黑’谬误的处理的主要问题在于,根据它最常被定义的方式,它基本上变成了与‘否否得正谬误’中的论证类型相同的论证”(233)。诉诸人身亚型:黑乌鸦必然涉及其他诉诸人身亚型之一。