and an increasing gap between the “left” and the “right” in democracies, the median voter theorem presents a model of anti-polarization: competing candidates move to the center of the ideological distribution to maximize vote share, regardless of the underlying ideological distribution of voters...
systematically using the Palestinian civilians as human shields.” The ambassador also called for the immediate release of all the hostages who were “brutally abducted on 7 October,” and correctly noted that this “assembly has once again failed to acknowledge this issue with today’s vote.” ...
I'm Karen Chammas. The European Union's parliament on Thursday overwhelmingly condemned the end of constitutional protections for abortion in the United States and called for such safeguards to be enshrined in the EU's Fundamental Rights charter. La...
Why Judges Always Vote This raises the cost of abstention, particularly to risk-averse justices. Second, the so-called narrowest grounds or Marks doctrine enforces the logic of... T Jacobi,E Kontorovich - 《International Review of Law & Economics》 被引量: 0发表: 2015年 The scope of part...
5.A.-S. Lapix: Que disent lesabstentionnistesquand on leur demande pourquoi ils ne votent pas? - 作为。 Lapix:当问及为什么不投票时,权会怎么说?机翻 「JT de France 2 2022年6月合集」评价该例句:好评差评指正 JT de France 2 2022年6月合集 ...
During the 2017...Downing, JosephDepartment of Politics, History and International Relations, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Aston University, Birmingham, UKBrun, Estelle E.Department of Government, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK...
Rather, what is mostimportant is that a non-trivial number of members ofCongress decide not to vote when contextual factorsforce them to choose between electioneering andlegislating. Consequently, while our results are notsufficient to induce a full-fledged ``paradox ofcongressional voting'' ...
This implies both that there can always be polarisation (anything goes) and that there will always be misaligned voting since people will vote for an option which is not their most preferred [20]. These limits are discussed in [21], where a panel of voting theorists deemed plurality as the...
This implies both that there can always be polarisation (anything goes) and that there will always be misaligned voting since people will vote for an option which is not their most preferred [20]. These limits are discussed in [21], where a panel of voting theorists deemed plurality as the...