if you are choosing between AMD and NVIDIA for Photoshop, it is pretty obvious that NVIDIA has a clear advantage. Like anything GPU-based in Photoshop, the difference isn't huge, but the Radeon RX Vega 64 is about 3% slower than the NVIDIA equivalent (the RTX 2070 SUPER) while the Radeo...
but keep in mind, that GPU is still $100 more expensive than the RX 5700 XT. The 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 / 2070S near-equivalent are included here for reference, not because they represent the direct competitors for these two GPUs. ...
AMD expects the Radeon 5700XT to offer performance approximately 1.14x faster than Vega 64, while drawing 23 percent less power. The rated TDPs on the 5700XT and 5700 are still higher than their Nvidia counterparts, but TDP is not a stand-in for power consumption; we'll...
Paraphrasing, I said, "You know that as soon as you announce pricing for the 5700 cards, Nvidia is going to respond, right? $399 for 2070 performance is a good deal, $450 would be high, and $500 is going to price the 5700 XT right out of the competition." I suspect that at ...
medi01What consumes more than 12nm Nvidia equivalent, are you from planet Earth?Well, if you look at your chart, the 5700XT is at 86% while the 2070 is the 95%. That tells me the 5700XT uses more power than the relative performance compared to 2070. TapionPerformance per watt doesn't...
Any CPU less powerful than that roughly 3700X equivalent, which the 2700X certainly is, are now firmly on the struggle bus. Especially with PS5 ports for the cited reason. No way would I buy a 4070 to have it crippled by a CPU that cannot properly leverage its features. Av...
In addition, for highly-threaded applications, this imparts a 2X cache increase, and lightly-threaded workloads now have access to a full 16MB of cache, equivalent to a 4X increase in directly-accessible cache. Re-using the Renoir SoC design also means that AMD has stuck with the PCIe 3.0...