The Supreme People’s Court of China issued the “Status of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in China’s Courts (2021)” on April 21. It said that the number of cases has increased significantly in new types of disputes involving Internet technologies, genetics, information and...
The Supreme People’s Court of China issued the “Status of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in China’s Courts (2021)” on April 21. It said that the number of cases has increased significantly in new types of disputes involving Internet technologies, genetics, information and...
Ho, Elaine
Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China, The The Supreme People's Court (" the Court") of the People's Republic of China (" PRC" or" China") is a distinctive institution, influenced by China's legal t... S Finder - 《J Chinese L》...
This volume presents cases selected by the trial departments of the Supreme People’s Court of China from their concluded cases. In order to give full weight to the legal value and social functions of cases from the Supreme People’s Court, and to achieve the goal of “serving the trial ...
The Supreme People’s Court of China issued the “Status of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in China’s Courts (2021)” on April 21. It said that the number of cases has increased significantly in new types of disputes involving Internet technologies, genetics, information and...
China's Supreme People's Court unveils five-year reform plan 2024-12-27 17:09:30 China unveils new quadruped robot capable of carrying adult across rough terrain 2024-12-27 10:32:43 2024 sees China’s historic Olympic harvests, pushing for reform in ball sports 2024-12-27 10:31:10...
The provision “the people’s court shall make a ruling not to acknowledge a civil judgment if acknowledging it would violate fundamental principles of state laws, such as the one-China principle, or undermine state sovereignty, security, or social public interests” is consistent with analogous ...
The Supreme People’s Court confirmed that the Chinese Court has jurisdiction over SEP global rate setting. It’s a milestone for OPPO in dealing with global patent litigations.
THE PRAGMATIC COURT: REINTERPRETING THE SUPREME PEOPLES COURT OF CHINA Columbia Journal of Asian LawZhang, Taisu