Overturning Chevron The Supreme Court’s June 28 ruling to overturn the Chevron doctrine (opens a new window) came in two cases challenging the 1984 decision: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce. By a 6-3 margin, the court overruled Chevr...
Although the decision overturned Chevron itself, it claimed not to overturn 40 years of judicial decisions made using Chevron deference. The Court explained that the change in interpretive methodology did not “call into question” those decisions because the principle of “statutory stare decisis” ...
The Biden administration called Chevron a "bedrock principle of administrative law" that gave weight to the expertise of federal agencies and warned its reversal would create an "upheaval." Already, legal scholars who disagree with the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron have warned it ...
One final note: Last year, I expressed hop that the Supreme Court would overturn the disgusting policy of civil asset forfeiture. That may still happen, though one year later than I hoped. Now let’s contemplate potential bad outcomes. Here are the three things I fear will happen this year...
Supreme Court gives Trump some immunity in Jan. 6 case, but not for 'unofficial acts' The Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated ruling in Donald Trump's appeal for presidential immunity from charges related to his efforts to overturn election loss. Jul...
The conservative majority on the US Supreme Court appears poised to overturn a longstanding legal doctrine in a decision that could have major implications for federal energy and climate regulations. During oral arguments on Wednesday in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the justices...
All four organizations publicly celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Chevron, which conservatives saw as the rightful curtailing of unelected bureaucrats’ authority. And just three days later, conservatives praised the court again when it ruled in the case of Corner Post v. Board ...
Twenty-three states are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a lower court decision that the attorneys general say could be a threat to the energy industry. A brief filed this week by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill and 22 other attorneys general wants the U.S. Supreme Court to...
"The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference could disrupt both traditional and renewable energy value chains potentially delaying project approvals, and creating a less predictable investment environment, which might hinder the innovation, development and deployment of energy infrastructure an...
prior decisions addressing agency actions underChevronmay be called into question by the Supreme Court's decision, particularly if the Court decides to overturnChevron. Similarly, the ruling could cast doubt on underlying agency positions that have been relied upon by regulated entities ...