The Supreme Court’s June 28 ruling to overturn the Chevron doctrine(opens a new window)came in two cases challenging the 1984 decision:Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoandRelentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce. By a 6-3 margin, the court overruledChevron, holding that courts must...
environment and health care."Chevron is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, as the [Administrative Procedure Act] requires," Roberts wrote for the court. The chief justice called the earlier decision a "ju...
Toss the Chevron deference and every time the EPA wants to close a facility leaching poisons into the drinking water, a federal court will decide the issue. That would be just as bad as it sounds. Corporate interests have been itching to get rid of the Chevron deference for as ...
DiscardingChevron.One option for the Court is eliminating theChevrondoctrine altogether. If the Court takes this approach, the law would likely revert to the rule set forth in the 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case ofSkidmore v. Swift & Co., which credits an agency's interpretation ...
Cites a supremecourt case between Chevron USA Inc. and Echazabel, a disabled employee of the company on job protection provided to employees who pose a risk o their own health and safety in the workplace. Arguments put forth by the worker on the basis of regulations from the U.S. Equal...
The justices turned away an appeal by the oil companies of a decision by Hawaii's top court allowing the suit, which alleged violations of state law, to proceed. Other defendants in the lawsuit include Exxon Mobil, BP, Shell, ConocoPhillips, BHP Group, Marathon Petroleum and Chev...
Partner Jacob Harper spoke with Healthcare Risk Management about how the agencies regulating the healthcare industry could respond to the US Supreme Court’s decision reversing the Chevron doctrine. Jacob said that concern about whether an agency’s determination will be overturned by a court is li...
The petitioners seek to overturn or greatly limit a 39-year-old Supreme Court case,Chevron vs. Natural Resources Defense Council. That ruling said that if a federal law is silent or ambiguous on a specific question, courts should defer to government agencies’ interpretation of the statute. ...
“Chevron is overruled,” declared the court on June 28. The decision’s scope is broad. “This ruling has impacts all across the administrative state, not just technology, but also finance, healthcare, the environment, etc.,” Jim Lundy, securities enforcement and litigation partner at Foley...
So there I was, reading through the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent rulings, when the phone rang. On the other end was my friend the general counsel, who apparently had been doing the same. “Oh man,” he said, launching into a diatribe. “This ruling to overturn the Chevron doctrine...