The petitioners seek to overturn or greatly limit a 39-year-old Supreme Court case,Chevron vs. Natural Resources Defense Council. That ruling said that if a federal law is silent or ambiguous on a specific question, courts should defer to government agencies’ interpretation of the statute. Adv...
HEALTH care fraudMEDICAL equipmentNURSING home residentsThe recent overturning of the Chevron doctrine by the Supreme Court has created uncertainty in the regulatory landscape and will test the judiciary's expertise in specific subject matters. The Chevron doctrine, established in 1984...
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could reverse -- or at least narrow -- the longstandingChevrondoctrine, which grants EPA and other federal agencies discretion to reasonably interpret ambiguous statutory language. The court May 1 granted a petition for awrit of certiorariinLoper ...
v. Department of Commerce has overruled the longstanding Chevron doctrine that required courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of a statute it administers when the statute was unclear or ambiguous. Now that the Court has repealed the doctrine, decades’ worth of presumptions ...
The US Supreme Court on June 28 decided Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce, overruling the Chevron doctrine that for four decades has required federal courts to defer to administrative agencies’ interpretations
Supreme Court overturns the Chevron Doctrine –Some people fret about the “deep state,” but practically speaking they should be concerned about the “administrative state.” The good news is that the Supreme Court may rule that bureaucrats don’t have leeway to impose more red tape in the ...
When the Court issues its opinion, it will likely take one of three potential approaches. First, the Court may discard theChevrondoctrine in its entirety. Second, the Court may adopt a middle-ground approach that would limitChevron's applicability – including, for example, by fol...
The U.S. Supreme Court accepted review of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo,1 which may determine the fate of the deference doctrine established in Chevron2 in 1984. The issue in Loper is whether the Court should overrule Chevron, or limit or clarify the applicability of requiring deference...
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled to limit the power of federal regulatory agencies, upending a 40-year precedent widely known as the Chevron Doctrine.
the Court held thatChevronhad not engendered substantial reliance because, almost since its inception, the Court has had to continually reshapeChevronthrough a series of patchworks and exceptions —Chevron“Step Zero,” the Major Questions Doctrine, and so on. Rathe...