HEALTH care fraudMEDICAL equipmentNURSING home residentsThe recent overturning of the Chevron doctrine by the Supreme Court has created uncertainty in the regulatory landscape and will test the judiciary's expertise in specific subject matters. The Chevron doctrine, established in 1984...
The Chevron deference doctrine has worked tolerably well for four decades, and the case for changing it hasn’t been made. If the conservative justices choose to abandon the doctrine just because they have the votes, they will reinforce the message from Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organiz...
interpretation of a statute. Third, the Court could limitChevron's application to statutes in which Congress has expressly authorized an agency to speak with the force of law to fill in statutory gaps. Fourth, the Court could hold that theChevrondoctrine does not apply where there...
OverturningChevron The Supreme Court’s June 28 ruling to overturn the Chevron doctrine(opens a new window)came in two cases challenging the 1984 decision:Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoandRelentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce. By a 6-3 margin, the court overruledChevron, holding...
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could reverse -- or at least narrow -- the longstanding Chevron doctrine, which grants EPA and other federal agencies discretion to reasonably interpret ambiguous statutory language.
The U.S. Supreme Court accepted review of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo,1 which may determine the fate of the deference doctrine established in Chevron2 in 1984. The issue in Loper is whether the Court should overrule Chevron, or limit or clarify the applicability of requiring deference...
Updates on the US Supreme Court overruling of the Chevron doctrine that required courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation
The Supreme Court released three major decisions on Friday. The court ruled to overturn the decades-old Chevron doctrine, limiting how federal agencies can enforce regulations, raised the bar for obstruction charges against Jan. 6 rioters, and upheld a law that lets cities ban homeless people fro...
The Chevron doctrine’s first step required courts to determine whether Congress directly spoke on the issue. If so, that ended the inquiry. If not, the second step required a reviewing court to defer to the agency’s permissible interpretation of the statute.3 Thus, when Congress was silent...
The US Supreme Court on June 28 decided Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce, overruling the Chevron doctrine that for four decades has required federal courts to defer to administrative agencies’ interpretations