The Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, a 40-year legal principle that has shaped the role of government agencies. The outcome could affect medication approval, pollution regulation, and more
When the Supreme Court formally disavowed Chevron deference last week in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, it instructed judges to make their own judgments about the “best” understanding of statutory law even in the face of statutory gaps and ambiguities. Instead of having a ...
August 22, 2024Chevron deference, domestic industry, exclusion order, Federal Circuit, Injunctive Relief, ITC, NPE, paid, patent infringement, patent litigation, Roku, Section 337, software patents, Supreme CourtDennis Crouch by Dennis Crouch Roku, Inc. has asked the Supreme Court to review 2024...
Supreme Court Considers Chevron Leave to Appeal; Fraudulent Ecuador Judgment Re PollutionSaxe, Dianne
The Supreme Court overturned a landmark 40-year-old decision that gave federal agencies broad regulatory power.
InLoper Bright, the Supreme Court held thatChevrondeference is incompatible with the APA and with courts’ paramount duty to interpret the laws that Congress enacts. In reaching this conclusion, the majority relied on the language of the APA, which assigns to f...
All four organizations publicly celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Chevron, which conservatives saw as the rightful curtailing of unelected bureaucrats’ authority. And just three days later, conservatives praised the court again when it ruled in the case of Corner Post v. Board ...
” he writes, in part because “agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguity. Courts do.” Moreover, Chevron has been chipped away at for years by courts, leaving it a mere “husk” of its former self. He notes the court has not encountered a Chevron case since ...
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in two cases, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce, on Friday that explicitly overruled Chevron. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson did not participate in the first case. In its decision, the court held that a federal law...
Whether the Supreme Court is overturningChevronor reviving major questions, David Doniger, a senior federal strategist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told CNN, “their goal is enfeebling the federal government.”