The Supreme Court'sreversal of the Chevron decisionalso further demonstrates the willingness of its six-justice conservative majority to jettison decades of past rulings. In June 2022, the courtoverturned Roe v. Wade, dismantling the constitutional right to abortion, and in June 2023, itended aff...
Toss the Chevron deference and every time the EPA wants to close a facility leaching poisons into the drinking water, a federal court will decide the issue. That would be just as bad as it sounds. Corporate interests have been itching to get rid of the Chevron deference for as ...
The Supreme Court’s landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council obligated federal courts to defer to administrative agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws. For the last 40 years, courts have issued numerous de
HEALTH care fraudMEDICAL equipmentNURSING home residentsThe recent overturning of the Chevron doctrine by the Supreme Court has created uncertainty in the regulatory landscape and will test the judiciary's expertise in specific subject matters. The Chevron doctrine, established in 1984...
Although the Supreme Court indicated that prior decisions relying on theChevronframework are not overturned, this decision will likely affect how, going forward, federal labor and employment agencies — such as the Department of Labor (DOL), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and ...
The Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, a 40-year legal principle that has shaped the role of government agencies. The outcome could affect medication approval, pollution regulation, and more
The petitioners seek to overturn or greatly limit a 39-year-old Supreme Court case,Chevron vs. Natural Resources Defense Council. That ruling said that if a federal law is silent or ambiguous on a specific question, courts should defer to government agencies’ interpretation of the statute. ...
Practical Guidance published Morgan Lewis’s LawFlash regarding the US Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce, which overruled the Chevron doctrine requiring federal courts to defer to admi
”Id. In the years following the initial decision, the Supreme Court emphasized thatChevronrested on “a presumption that Congress, when it left ambiguity in a statute meant for implementation by an agency, understood that the ambiguity would be resolved, first and foremost, by the agency.”...
so the Court's decision to hear these cases does not mean that there were ever five votes to modify or overruleChevron. Without a fifth vote to discard or modifyChevron, the doctrine will remain intact. It is particularly telling that Chief Justice Roberts asked at oral argument...