This checklist presents a set of security recommendations to help you ensure your workload is secure. If you don't review the checklist and weigh the associated tradeoffs, you may expose your design to potential risks. Thoroughly assess all the aspects outlined in the checklist to enhance your ...
Quality Appraisal Using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses eTable 2. Systematic Review Characteristics (Selected from the Joanna Briggs Institute Data Extraction Form for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses) eTable 3. Comparisons of Qu...
The World Health Organisation has called to take action in order to address global health inequalities1as one of the major global health challenges2,3,4,5. Particularly when it comes to mental health, the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is estimated to be far higher...
Reviewer checklist打開新的分頁/視窗 Articles from Reviewers' Update Connect Want to become a certified peer reviewer? Connect How to tackle your first review Connect Paving the way to increase diversity in journals – and research Connect
Overview Checklist Revision: 1 Overview This document provides an annotated checklist which vcpkg team members use to apply the "reviewed" label on incoming pull requests. If a pull request violates any of these points, we may ask contributors to make necessary changes before we can merge the ...
ChecklistISO/IEC 17025ISO 15189Management reviews are key processes in many quality-management systems, including laboratory-management systems, in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 15189. These reviews are fine opportunities to understand and manage all the inputs and...
In accordance with reporting guidelines for systematic reviews, a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist is available for this review (Additional file3). Results Searches identified 3856 potentially relevant articles. Following review of titles and abstracts,...
The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the validated mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The MMAT has been used in prior systematic reviews and is a checklist comprised of 27-items used to assess the quality of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies included ...
using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool16,17 for RCTs and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for single-arm studies. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer (M.D.). Data Extraction Relevant data were extracted independently by 2 researchers (M.S. and C.P., L.G., K.N....
The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension Mass Violence and the Complex Spectrum of Mental Illness and Mental Functioning Neuropsychiatry Sequelae of COVID-19 A New Framework for Dementia Nomenclature Organization and Performance of US Health Systems Pharmacy Benefit Managers: History, Business Practices, Economics...