Jones, Zimmerman
文档介绍:Bell’s theorem is silly, false, misleading, interesting Gordon Watson ? 1 October 2015: A reply to the challenge, “What’s your problem with Bell’s theorem?”(For me, a problem is a deviation from an expectation.) 1 Bell’s theorem #. This reply is based monsense local-...
could prove which theory was correct. If the correlation remained below a limit derived from Bell’s theorem, this would suggest hidden variables were real; if it exceeded Bell’s limit, then the mind-boggling tenets of quantum mechanics would reign supreme. And yet, in sp...
third. we considered the rabbit illusion as present when there was a displacement of the second stimulus >10% of the distance between first and third stimuli. we further assessed whether the second stimulus was assigned to the correct limb, that is to the same as the first stimulus or not ...
For example, let’s say our data follows Gaussian distribution.You all must have seen how a Gaussian distribution looks like, right? If not, this example shows a bell curve following normal distribution.There are certain observations which could be inferred from the figure in the link above:...
The Monte Carlo simulation is used to model the probability of different outcomes in a process that cannot easily be predicted because of the potential for random variables.
Bell's TheoremQuantum MeasurementBy analyzing the same Bell experiment in different reference frames, we show that nature at its fundamental level is superdeterministic, not random, in contrast to what is indicated by orthodox quantum mechanics. Events-including the results of quantum mechanical ...
In fact, Bell's theorem, understood as violation of Bell inequalities by quantum predictions, is consistent with Bohr's notion of complementarity. Thus, if it points to anything, then it is rather the significance of the principle of Bohr, but even this is not a clear implication. Non-...
In fact, Bell's theorem,\nunderstood as violation of Bell inequalities by quantum predictions, is\nconsistent with Bohr's notion of complementarity. Thus, if it points to\nanything, then it is rather the significance of the principle of Bohr, but even\nthis is not a clear implication. ...
The 'magic' in Bell's Theorem results is not eliminated as it still exists contained within Malus results, and that 'magic' [of somehow exceeding the Bell Inequalities] remains unexplained by this paper, except it is shown that the 'magic' does not involve action-at-a-distance nor ...