[4] 参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5] 参见:http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf [6] 参见:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2006cv01692/122657/43/0.pdf?ts=1411522290 [...
[3]参见:https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20211015 [4]参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5]参见:http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf [6]参见:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/...
[3] 参见:https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20211015 [4] 参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5] 参见:http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf ...
The U.S. Supreme Court wrapped-up its 2023-24 term on July 1, leaving in its wake a spate of decisions that have heads still spinning. The most publicized decision was its affirmation inTrump v. United Statesthat presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts.” The...
The death ofChevronalso does not mean an end to deference. First, as the majority opinion recognizes, Congress may (subject to certain constitutional limitations such as the Non-Delegation Doctrine) expressly delegate discretionary authority to agencies. The decision ...
As Justice Elena Kagan put it in her dissenting opinion, "In one fell swoop, the majority today gives itself exclusive power over every open issue — no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden — involving the meaning of regulatory law. As if it did not have enough on its plate, the...
Over three decades of oil drilling in the Ecuadorian Amazon, Chevron dumped more than 16 billion gallons of toxic wastewater into the rainforest, leaving local people suffering a wave of cancers, miscarriages, and birth defects. Now, with the support of
“The majority’s decision today will cause a massive shock to the legal system,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissenting opinion. By reversing its 1984 ruling in the case of Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council — which let judges defer to federal agencies’ interpretation of stat...
Just a few days ago, the Supreme Court struck down the 1984 decisionChevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. The practical consequences of that move will unfold over the coming years, but the philosophical implications of it are already clear and consequential. ...
Related articleOral dissents are back in vogue at the Supreme Court as liberals lament latest rulings Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion overruling the precedent, writing for an ideologically split 6-3 court that “Courts must exercise their independent judgement in deciding whether an ...