[2]参见:https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference [3]参见:https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20211015 [4]参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5]参见:http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf [6]参见:https://...
[2] 参见:https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference [3] 参见:https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20211015 [4] 参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5] 参见:http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf [6] 参见:h...
The US Supreme Court’s June 28, 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce overruled the forty-year-old Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. decision, one of the most-cited cases in US law...
But Roberts’ stipulation may not be enough to stop the “legal earthquake” that the court created with its ruling, according to Cary Coglianese, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania and director of the Penn Program on Regulation. The Supreme Court protected agencies’ past actions,...
[2] 参见:https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference [3] 参见:https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20211015 [4] 参见:https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/22mj00067CriminalOpinion.pdf [5] 参见:...
The majority cited the language of the APA, which assigns to federal courts the authority to “decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.” The Supreme Court explained ...
When the Supreme Court formally disavowed Chevron deference last week in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, it instructed judges to make their own judgments about the “best” understanding of statutory law even in the face of statutory gaps and ambiguities. Instead of having a ...
The Biden administration called Chevron a "bedrock principle of administrative law" that gave weight to the expertise of federal agencies and warned its reversal would create an "upheaval." Already, legal scholars who disagree with the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron have warned it ...
, the Supreme Court declared that judges must exercise their independent judgment in interpreting statutes. While judges can consider an agency’s expertise and consistency, they are no longer bound to accept the agency’s interpretation. Now, courts may provide their own interpretation of the l...
For now, opponents of regulations are constrained by a six-year statute of limitation for challenging executive branch actions under the relevant law. But the Supreme Court has yet to decide a case heard this term that might gut that limitation. That decision is expected Monday. ...