Supreme Court’s overturning of Chevron ruling shifts regulatory authority from agencies to courts Back Back The Supreme Court’s landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council obligated federal courts to defer to administrative agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambigu...
In justifying this ruling, Roberts cites not only the courts’ constitutional primacy in interpreting laws, but sources ranging from Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78 to Chief Justice John Marshall in the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison. But he relies most heavily on provisions of the1946 A...
Four days after theSupreme Court ruledin the case of Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo, overturning the 40-year-old precedent known as theChevron deference, the justices announced they would besending nine cases backto lower courts in light of their ruling. This batch of cases may be the ...
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in two cases, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce, on Friday that explicitly overruled Chevron. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson did not participate in the first case. In its decision, the court held that a federal law...
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on “Chevron deference” could affect federal regulations of everything from power plant emissions to electric vehicles to transmission lines
The Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, a 40-year legal principle that has shaped the role of government agencies. The outcome could affect medication approval, pollution regulation, and more
While the conservative legal movement decried the growth of the so-called administrative state, the Supreme Court's decision to reconsider the Chevron rulingsparked concernsthat unwinding or even limiting the framework would threaten the ability of federal agencies to craft regulations on issues like ...
The decision overturning Chevron was only one ofconsequential high court rulings this past week. Together they have shaken the ground beneath the administrative state and shifted key decision-making power to the courts. Chevron was never as well-known as Roe v. Wade, but its centrality to th...
While the Court left in place prior judicial rulings that relied on Chevron to enforce preexisting regulations or agency orders, the Court held that, going forward, Article III courts may not defer to an agency’s interpretation of the law. Implications for IP Law in the U...
For now, opponents of regulations are constrained by a six-year statute of limitation for challenging executive branch actions under the relevant law. But the Supreme Court has yet to decide a case heard this term that might gut that limitation. That decision is expected Monday. Chief Justice...