Also, unlike LRU, ARC is "scan-Resistant" in that it allows one-time sequential requests to pass through without polluting the cache. ARC leads to substantial performance gains over LRU for a wide range of cache sizes. For example, on a workstation disk drive workload, at 16MB cache, ...
This article argues that the self-tuning, low-overhead, scan resistant adaptive replacement cache (ARC) algorithm outperforms the least-recently-used (LRU) algorithm by dynamically responding to changing access patterns and continually balancing between workload recency and frequency features. The ARC'...
Moreover, the algorithm makes use of two queues separately maintaining new blocks and old blocks to avoid the degradation of hit ratios. Our trace-driven simulation results show that it performs better than LRU and ARCdoi:10.1007/s11432-011-4213-zNong...
so the cache miss penalty could be decreased significantly.Moreover,the algorithm makes use of two queues separately maintaining new blocks and old blocks to avoid the degradation of hit ratios.Our trace-driven simulation results show that it performs better than LRU and ARC for a wide range of...
We define average retrieval cost ratio (ARCR), as the cost saved by using a cache divided by the total retrieval cost if no cache was used. We compare performance of LFC-K with other caching algorithms using ARCR, hit-ratio and byte-hit ratio as performance metrics. Our experimental ...
If the counter value exceed means it should be removed and the space in the counter will be free so that if too many request arrive means the crash will not occur and reduce the capacity.A.RadhaVasanN.VinothM.Abdul RahumanS.Silambarasan...
Our experimental results showed that the proposed CA-RRIP algorithm also reduces the average cache miss rate of the system under various cache access patterns.doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.05.002Pengfei Yang aQuan Wang aHongwei Ye aZhiqiang Zhang bJournal of Systems Architecture...